Loading your building brief…
Loading your building brief…
Your building brief
Casa LomaNeighbourhoods (158 model)neighbourhoods-4326.geojsonrow 62 · Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul'sCity Wardscity-wards-data-4326.geojsonrow 13
From City of Toronto open data, Toronto Police and CMHC. Pick a tab below; hover a source tag to see the dataset row behind a figure.
Explore the address and its surroundings.
The records' standout deviations for this address, worst first.
Picking what to flag.
Flagging what stands out in the records…
The basics about the building at this address.
326 Avenue Rd
No air conditioning and no cooling room on file. Ask how units stay cool in a heat wave.
Registration details are filled in by landlords themselves.
Unverified
Ontario's November 15, 2018 first-occupancy rule matters: new buildings and additions first occupied for residential use after that date can be exempt from the rent-increase guideline. Year built alone cannot establish rent-control status.
First-occupancy evidence is not in the City datasets used here. Confirm the occupancy history with the landlord before relying on rent-increase limits.
Ontario's rent-increase guidance (opens new tab)Address: Address Points (Municipal) · address-points-4326.csv · row 373,293
An inspection snapshot, with the lowest-scoring categories and past evaluations.
Recorded inspection score
96/ 100Apartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 2
Inspection date
Nov 27, 2025
At or above the city median
City median: 92 / 100 across 3,593 buildings (each building's latest 2023+ evaluation) · 74% of evaluated buildings score lower. A score describes a recorded inspection; it is not a guarantee of current conditions.
Category scale: 1 is the lowest score; 3 is the highest (0 also appears in the data). Overall scores are weighted and cannot be inferred by averaging these items.
Source: Apartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO) · apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csv · row 2
Based on what the records flag. Take them to the viewing and tick them off as you ask.
Writing your questions…
CMHC's October survey of purpose-built rental apartments, in CAD per month.
Former City of Toronto (Zones 1-4)CMHC Rental Market Surveyrmr-toronto-2025-en.xlsxrow 12
CMHC Rental Market Survey, October 2025
| Unit type | Vacant unitsclosest to a new lease | All unitsincl. long-time tenants |
|---|---|---|
| Bachelor | $1,713 | $1,526 |
| 1 bedroom | $2,092 | $1,914 |
| 2 bedrooms | $2,857 | $2,457 |
| 3+ bedrooms | Not published | $3,195 |
Paste the rental ad on the home page and the asking rent is compared with these figures here.
Survey averages describe purpose-built rental apartments across Former City of Toronto (Zones 1-4), a much bigger area than one block; condos and basement units rent differently. They are not a valuation of this apartment, and included utilities may differ.
Source: CMHC Rental Market Survey · rmr-toronto-2025-en.xlsx · row 12
RentSafeTO apartment buildings within 250 m, nearest first. Useful for comparing options on the same block.
At or above the city median (92)Up to 10 points belowMore than 10 below
| Address | Score | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| 330 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 4 | 93 at or above median | 15 m |
| 320 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 358 | 96 at or above median | 15 m |
| 340 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 6 | 97 at or above median | 50 m |
| 342 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 8 | 94 at or above median | 67 m |
| 291 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 355 | 97 at or above median | 150 m |
| 394 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 9 | 93 at or above median | 176 m |
| 396 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 12 | 98 at or above median | 196 m |
| 398 Avenue RdApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 14 | 97 at or above median | 215 m |
| 7 Edmund AveApartment Building Evaluations (RentSafeTO)apartment-building-evaluations-2023-current.csvrow 5,645 | 90 slightly below median | 227 m |
Scores are each building's latest evaluation. What the score means.
Active building permits within 250 m, and the major projects among them.
238Building Permitsbuilding-permits-active-permits.csv5 rows, e.g. 179,895, 72,736, 51,099, 127,750, 183,643
active permits
New Building or Demolition permits, or estimated construction cost of $1,000,000 or more.
Building permit · New Houses
199 m away
Proposal to construct a new 2 storey SFD with integral garage and finished basement. See Demo, PPR, and COA.
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 90,449
Building permit · New Houses
244 m away
Proposal to demolish existing dwelling and construct a new three-storey single family dwelling with finished basement. See also 25-178454 ZAP and 25-204213 STE 12 MV
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 11,660
Building permit · New Houses
An issued permit does not establish an active construction schedule. Dates and statuses are shown as the City records them.
Planning applications within 250 m: rezonings, site plans, condominiums and subdivisions. One project often has several applications.
No open applications in this radius.
All active permits; cleared permits only if completed since 2025-01-01.
No permits on record for this exact address.
Requests to the City, Jan 1, 2026 – Sep 30, 2026.
These 311 requests are NOT complaints against the selected building. The City records them by postal area, intersection or ward, never by building.
34
Only requests reported at a street intersection have a location; requests reported by postal code are not included here.
20,711
Every request in the ward, any location type.
Resolution information is unavailable: this dataset has no closed dates or resolution-time fields. “Open” means the status was New or In Progress when the City published the file. Nearby and ward totals cover different areas and should not be compared directly.
Incidents per 100,000 people. Bar: Casa Loma; tick: all of Toronto.
More than 10% below the city rateWithin 10%More than 10% above
Below city rate77 incidents · rate up 147.7 from 2024
Below city rate10 incidents · rate down 83 from 2024
Above city rate11 incidents · rate up 36 from 2024
Above city rate44 incidents · rate down 42.2 from 2024
Below city rate0 incidents · rate same as 2024
Below city rate4 incidents · rate down 52.6 from 2024
Above city rate2 incidents · rate up 14.7 from 2024
Below city rate14 incidents · rate down 31.4 from 2024
Below city rate5 incidents · rate down 8 from 2024
Rates are incidents per 100,000 people, published by Toronto Police Service per neighbourhood. Neighbourhood rates describe the whole neighbourhood, not a street or building.
2021 Census · population 11,350Neighbourhood Profiles, 2021 Censusnbhd_2021_census_profile_full_158model.xlsxspreadsheet row 4, neighbourhood 96. Bar: Casa Loma; tick: median of Toronto's 158 neighbourhoods.
More than 10% below the medianWithin 10%More than 10% above
Well above the median
Well above the median
Well below the median
2021 Census, City of Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles (158 neighbourhoods). Shares are computed here from the published counts. Only cost, housing burden and repairs are colour-rated; grey bars are shown for context. Shelter cost is rent plus utilities as the census defines it, from 2021; it is not a current asking rent.
Unverified community feedback and resident experiences.
No reviews yet. Tenant reviews will appear here once posting is available.
Reviews are subjective opinions of contributors and do not represent verified City inspections or formal tenancy dispute determinations.
Evaluations before 2023 used a different scoring system, so older scores aren't directly comparable.
244 m away
Proposal to demolish existing dwelling and construct a new three-storey single family dwelling with finished basement. See also 25-188023 ZAP and 25-204214 STE 12 MV
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 11,661
Building permit · Small Residential Projects
200 m away
Proposal to construct a 3-storey rear addition and interior alterations.
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 6,512
Building permit · New Building
59 m away
New parking garage to serve townhouse dwelling units to be constructed under related permit 17 248758 and 17 248759, Blocks 3 &4 .
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 51,742
Building permit · New Building
59 m away
New parking garage to serve townhouse dwelling units to be constructed under related permit 17 248756 and 17 248757, Blocks 1&2.
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 59,065
Building permit · Small Residential Projects
75 m away
Proposed 2 storey addition to existing 1 storey portion of existing home (addition will be a total of 3 storeys), and renovation of the existing house including relocation of plumbing fixtures and alterations to hvac.
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 17,979
Building permit · New Houses
114 m away
Proposal for a new 3 storey SFD-Detached with new detached garage & shoring provided.
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 9,993
Building permit · New Houses
203 m away
To construct a new 3 storey dwelling on existing basement footprint
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 1,413
Building permit · Demolition Folder (DM)
203 m away
To construct a new 3 storey dwelling on existing basement footprint
Source: Building Permits · building-permits-active-permits.csv · row 1,414